Performances
Naxos
Javascript not enabled.
Sheet Music
Scores and Parts
Editor
|
First edition
|
Publisher. Info.
|
Paris: Heugel & Cie., 1905. Plate H. & Cie 22,180.
|
Copyright
|
|
Misc. Notes
|
This file is part of the Sibley Mirroring Project. Note that in the Cello part for the 3rd movement, Figure 6 is printed 3 bars too early.
|
Purchase
|
Javascript is required for this feature.
|
| |
Javascript is required to submit files.
General Information
Work Title
|
Quintet for Violin, Oboe (or Clarinet, Violin 2), Viola, Cello, and Piano
|
Alternative. Title
|
|
Composer
|
Dubois, Théodore
|
I-Catalogue NumberI-Cat. No.
|
ITD 61
|
Key
|
F major
|
Movements/SectionsMov'ts/Sec's
|
4 movements:
- 1 Allegro ( = 152)
- 2 Canzonetta. Tranquillo (A major. = 58-66)
- 3 Adagio non troppo (D♭ major. = 56)
- 4 Allegro con fuoco (F minor. = 160)
|
First Publication.
|
1905
|
Dedication
|
A mes amis Diémer, Lefort, Gillet, Laforge, et Loëb (identications somewhat conjectural, see below)
|
Average DurationAvg. Duration
|
27-30 minutes
|
Composer Time PeriodComp. Period
|
Romantic
|
Piece Style
|
Romantic
|
Instrumentation
|
violin, oboe (or violin 2 or clarinet), viola, cello, piano
|
Navigation etc.
Performed in London (along with Harold Darke's wind and piano quartet and Reger's op.77a trio-serenade in A) on March 20, 1909 in Kensington, UK (2nd of a pair of concerts, the other of which had other interesting, mostly French, works; see description @ Musical Times.)
Of the dedicatees, one assumes Diémer was Louis Diémer, the pianist; Gillet might be Ernest Gillet or his brother Georges (probably Georges Gillet, since Georges was oboist, Ernest was cellist, and J. Loëb seems to have been cellist); Loëb might be J. Loëb (Jules Loeb?) the cellist; Theophile Edouard Laforge was a violist. Which leaves Lefort, violinist, presumably? Narcisse Augustin Lefort (the dates seem right anyway?...)
Recorded on ATMA ACD 22385 (2007) together with Dubois' piano quartet in A minor. The notes to the recording do identify "Diémer" as Louis Diémer, noting that Diémer was one of Dubois' colleagues at the Conservatoire (making it more likely that Louis rather than some less known, perhaps social acquaintance, Diémer was intended, perhaps?... Difficult to be more certain, of course, without naming evidence from the composer...)